Tax, Audit, Firm and Regulatory News

]

Today’s Employer Topic – March 1, 2019

Imposing health care plan waiting periods on rehired employees


It’s not uncommon for employers in some industries and localities to occasionally rehire a previously terminated employee. Should such a situation occur, you may wonder how to properly handle the waiting period typically imposed on new hires preceding their eligibility for health care benefits. The answer depends on the status of your organization under the Affordable Care Act (ACA).

Smaller organizations

Let’s say you’re a smaller business not subject to the ACA’s employer shared-responsibility provision and you sponsor a group health plan under which full-time employees are eligible for coverage after a 90-day waiting period. (That’s the maximum duration allowed under the ACA.)

Generally, former employees who are terminated and rehired may be treated as newly eligible for coverage upon rehire. This means that your plan may require such individuals to meet the plan’s eligibility criteria and satisfy the plan’s waiting period anew.

But regulations specify that imposition of the waiting period must be reasonable under the circumstances. For example, the termination and rehire cannot be a subterfuge to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation.

Important gaps

The regulations don’t elaborate on what’s required for a new waiting period upon rehire to be “reasonable under the circumstances” and not a “subterfuge.” They do, however, include an example in which the terminating employee had “no expectation of providing further services” and the gap between the termination date and the rehire date was approximately three months.

Under that scenario, the regulations permit the employee to be treated as newly eligible for coverage under the plan upon rehire, allowing the imposition of the plan’s waiting period. This suggests that there shouldn’t be a prearranged understanding that the terminating employee will return to employment.

In addition, there should be a sufficient period between the termination date and the rehire date. For instance, applying a new waiting period to an employee who terminates on a Friday and is rehired on the following Monday likely wouldn’t be considered reasonable under the circumstances.

Large employers

Applicable large employers (ALEs) that are subject to the ACA’s employer shared-responsibility provision should keep in mind that the rules for ALEs require some returning employees to be deemed continuing employees even after relatively lengthy absences.

Thus, even though the waiting period rules may allow a new waiting period for a rehired employee, implementing a waiting period for an employee who must be treated as a continuing full-time employee under the ACA’s “play or pay” provision could expose an ALE to penalties.

Compliant reintegration

Not every termination is forever. Many industries have skilled labor shortages and busy seasons that may drive an employer to rehire an employee who was recently let go. Contact us for further information on how to stay in compliance when reintegrating such employees into your health care benefits program.

© 2019

Related News Posts

Attribution rules explained: how constructive ownership can affect your tax strategy

Attribution rules explained: how constructive ownership can affect your tax strategy

You may think you don’t own a particular business interest, but the IRS might disagree. Under constructive ownership rules, the tax code can attribute ownership to you based on family relationships or entity structures. Understanding these rules before they impact your tax strategy is essential for business owners with family ties, trusts, or complex ownership structures.

read more
Final regulations released on increased catch-up contributions under SECURE 2.0

Final regulations released on increased catch-up contributions under SECURE 2.0

The latest IRS final regulations under the SECURE 2.0 Act increase catch-up contribution limits for individuals aged 60 to 63 and require Roth contributions for higher-income earners. These changes aim to enhance retirement readiness but require plan administrators to navigate new operational complexities. Explore how these rules reshape retirement strategies and the paths to compliance.

read more